Research Another Vehicle

Total NHTSA Complaints
10
Owner filings recorded
#1 Reported Problem
Powertrain & Transmission
4 reports (40%)
Crash Incident Reports
0
Zero collision citations
Fire & Injury Reports
0
0 fire • 0 injury filings
Defect Investigation Analysis

Executive Problem Findings

AutoUtility currently tracks 10 official NHTSA owner defect complaints for the 2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT. Powertrain & Transmission issues are the most frequently reported category, appearing in 4 complaints (40% of submitted records). Zero crashes, fires, injury reports, or fatality reports are cited across these complaint records.

Methodology Notice: Consumer complaints are unverified voluntary submissions to the NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation (ODI). Filings are not normalized for sales volume or vehicle mileage and do not constitute an audited component failure rate.
Incident & Severity Profile
  • • Total Owner Reports: 10 complaints submitted under federal penalty.
  • • Primary Subsystem: Powertrain & Transmission accounts for 40% of submissions (4 reports).
  • • Secondary Systems: Engine & Cooling (2), Brakes & Traction Control (2).
  • • Crash Incidents: 0 filings cite an impact or collision.
  • • Thermal Incidents: 0 filings cite smoke or fire.
  • • Reported Casualties: 0 injury filings • 0 fatality filings.
Category Distribution

Reported Defect Categories for 2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT

Factual proportion of owner complaints categorized by automotive subsystem in NHTSA records

Powertrain & Transmission
4
40%
Engine & Cooling
2
20%
Brakes & Traction Control
2
20%
Wheels & Tires
1
10%
Suspension
1
10%
#1 40% SHARE

Powertrain & Transmission

4 owner complaints submitted to NHTSA ODI for this subsystem.

✓ 0 Incidents
⚠️ 3 Associated Recall Campaigns
#2 20% SHARE

Engine & Cooling

2 owner complaints submitted to NHTSA ODI for this subsystem.

✓ 0 Incidents
#3 20% SHARE

Brakes & Traction Control

2 owner complaints submitted to NHTSA ODI for this subsystem.

✓ 0 Incidents
#4 10% SHARE

Wheels & Tires

1 owner complaint submitted to NHTSA ODI for this subsystem.

✓ 0 Incidents
Federal Oversight

Official NHTSA Defect Investigations (1)

Formal engineering analyses and preliminary evaluations opened by the NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation

ODI Action #EA21002 OPEN Engineering Analysis (EA)
Opened: 2021-09-17 • Active
Subject / Subsystem
Desiccated Air Bag Inflator Rupture
Affected Component
AIR BAGS:FRONTAL:DRIVER SIDE:INFLATOR MODULE
Recall Linkage
No direct recall linkage
From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.Consequently, all frontal inflators using propellant 2004 that do not contain a "desiccant" (a substance that traps and holds moisture) in US vehicles are under recall. These "non-desiccated" inflators either have been or are required to be replaced.In some cases, the remedy part for these recalled inflators was, or will be, an inflator using either propellant 2004 or 2004L that does contain a desiccant. None of these "desiccated" remedy parts (which were installed in older model year vehicles) are currently under recall for a degradation concern. Certain subsets of desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004 for use as original equipment, however, have been recalled for a degradation concern. All Takata inflators produced with propellant 2004L contain desiccant, and none of these desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L are under recall for a degradation concern. There have been no reported field ruptures in any non-recalled desiccated PSAN inflators.It is understood that desiccants fully saturate at some threshold, at which point any additional moisture will not be captured. This means the degradation process observed in non-desiccated inflators using propellant 2004 may also occur in non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004, assuming additional moisture enters the inflator and high temperature cycling occurs. Based on available information, desiccant saturation can occur within the first five years in the worst environments, and the time required for full saturation is affected by multiple factors. While no present safety risk has been identified, further work is needed to evaluate the future risk of non-recalled desiccated inflators using propellant 2004.Three entities -- Takata (now known as TK Global), the Independent Testing Coalition, and Exponent -- have been studying the long-term behavior of Takata desiccated PSAN inflators using propellant 2004L (as well as 2004) in the presence of moisture and temperature cycling. The research efforts, which include development of predictive modeling techniques and field sample analysis, are ongoing. To date, none of the researchers have identified field evidence showing that propellant 2004L is undergoing a degradation process that leads to aggressive deployment and potential rupture. However, the time in service of such inflators remains short compared to that of the inflators using propellant 2004. Further study is needed to assess the long-term safety of desiccated inflators using propellant 2004L.The Office of Defects Investigation is opening this investigation to examine whether a safety defect related to propellant degradation exists in non-recalled desiccated PSAN frontal inflators manufactured by Takata. This investigation will require extensive information on Takata production processes and surveys of inflators in the field. Lists of recall actions that may have used desiccated PSAN inflators as remedy parts, as well as the makes and models originally manufactured with them, is available with the downloadable version of this document (see nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=EA21002 -- note this information is subject to change/revision as the investigation proceeds). This investigation does not supersede EA15-001, which remains open.
Consumer Filings

Recent NHTSA Owner Reports for 2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT

Representative defect filings submitted by owners to the NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation

Powertrain & Transmission ODI #11575491
Filed: 03/05/2024
Defect Report

"The contact owns a 2016 Mercedes-Benz GTS. The contact stated that on several occasions while driving at various speeds, the vehicle started to lose motive power with the check engine warning light illuminated. Additionally, the contact observed a grinding noise emanating from the engine..."

Powertrain & Transmission ODI #11482052
Filed: 08/30/2022
Defect Report

"The contact owns a 2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 21V478000 (Power Train) however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair...."

Engine & Cooling ODI #11476111
Filed: 07/27/2022
Defect Report

"2016 MERCEDES BENZ AMG. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARD TO NHTSA SAFETY RECALL 21V-478. THE CONSUMER STATED THE MANUFACTURER EXCEEDED A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME COMPLETING THE RECALL REPAIR. THE PARTS WERE NOT AVAILABLE."

Powertrain & Transmission ODI #11406344
Filed: 04/04/2021
Defect Report

"DRIVING ON THE INTERSTATE AND HEARD 2-3 LOUD POPS, CAR WAS IN MOTION AND LOSS POWER AND WOULD NOT ACCELERATE. LUCKY THERE WAS NO OTHER CARS ON THE INTERSTATE AT THE TIME, CAR WILL START BUT WILL NOT MOVE. HAD IT TOWED TO THE NEAREST MERCEDES DEALERSHIP AND THEY SAID IT WAS THE 2 PIECE DRIVESHAFT..."

Brakes & Traction Control ODI #11364837
Filed: 10/17/2020
Defect Report

"I COULDN'T GO TO TAKE THE CAR ON A TEST DRIVE. I WAS 3 HOURS AWAY BUT THEY HELP ME GET EVERYTHING DONE ONLINE. AND WHEN I WENT TO GET THE VEHICLE.MY BROTHER NOTICE A BUBBLE ON THE TIRE. TOLD THE REPRESENTATIVE HE SAID HE WILL SEND ME A NEW TIRE. HE SUBMITTED IT THROW THE INSURANCE. AND WHEN I TOOK..."

Multi-Year Trend

Complaint History for Mercedes-Benz AMG GT

Reported defect complaint volume across sibling model years (2016–2026)

Model Year NHTSA Complaints Crash Reports Safety Recalls Detailed Report
2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Current Page 10 0 5 Current
2017 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 1 0 5 View 2017 Problems →
2018 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 0 0 6 View 2018 Problems →
2019 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 0 0 6 View 2019 Problems →
2020 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 0 0 4 View 2020 Problems →
2021 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 0 0 2 View 2021 Problems →
2022 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 0 0 0 View 2022 Problems →
2023 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 0 0 0 View 2023 Problems →
2024 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 0 0 0 View 2024 Problems →
2025 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 0 0 0 View 2025 Problems →
2026 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 0 0 0 View 2026 Problems →
Exhaustive System Audit

Detailed NHTSA Component Breakdown for 2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT

Complete distribution of consumer defect reports across all 6 granular NHTSA system and subsystem classifications

Vehicle Component / System Total Complaints Crash Reports Fire Reports Injury Entries Fatality Entries
Powertrain NHTSA category: POWER TRAIN 4 0 0 0 0
Engine NHTSA category: ENGINE 2 0 0 0 0
Service Brakes NHTSA category: SERVICE BRAKES 1 0 0 0 0
Steering NHTSA category: STEERING 1 0 0 0 0
SUSPENSION,UNKNOWN OR OTHER 1 0 0 0 0
WHEELS,SERVICE BRAKES 1 0 0 0 0
Search Intelligence

Quick Answers: Common Problems & Reliability Questions for the 2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT

Direct, deterministic answers synthesized from verified United States government databases for the 2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT

What are the most common reported problems with the 2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT?

In official NHTSA consumer records, the most frequently cited issue area for the 2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT is Powertrain & Transmission, appearing in 4 records (40% of submitted filings).

Secondary reported categories include Engine & Cooling (2) and Brakes & Traction Control (2).

Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation (ODI)

Is the 2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT a reliable vehicle?

AutoUtility does not issue subjective reliability scores or commercial ratings. In official United States government records, NHTSA tracks 10 consumer defect complaints and 5 safety recall campaigns for the 2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT.

Reviewing documented component complaint distributions, recall remedy notices, and active federal investigations provides an objective, evidence-based view of the vehicle's historical safety and defect record.

Source: NHTSA ODI & Safety Recalls Databases

Are there crash, fire, or injury reports associated with the 2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT?

Consumer complaint records on file with NHTSA for the 2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT cite zero crashes, zero fires, and zero injuries.

Incident entries represent consumer descriptions at the time of submission to federal authorities and do not establish mechanical causation or legal liability.

Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation Consumer Logs

Has NHTSA formally investigated defects on the 2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT?

NHTSA ODI records list 1 formal defect investigation involving the 2016 Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (1 currently open).

Federal defect investigations are formal engineering evaluations opened when safety defect trends emerge, and do not by themselves establish a confirmed defect or mandatory recall.

Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation Registry
Official US Government Data Provenance

The complaint records on this page are retrieved directly from the NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) public database under 49 CFR Part 576.

Local Production Store Compiled: August 2026 • Deterministic Audited Dataset • Zero Dynamic External API Runtime Latency.